Jump to content
Toggle menu
  • 10 articles
  • 1 users
  • 89 edits
Misconduct in Public Office
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.
Revision as of 23:29, 24 September 2026 by Mark (talk | contribs) (Flag template for sub judice content)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Flags a page or section as published despite an active right-of-reply window or ongoing proceedings, with mandatory editorial justification. Per the page approval checklist, a page carrying this flag may be approved even while the underlying


   Right of reply
   Notice and response record — {{{recipient}}}

Notice of this page was sent to {{{recipient}}} on {{{sent}}} by {{{method}}}, identifying the matters at {{{imputations}}} of this page and inviting a response for publication. As at the date of this revision no substantive response has been received. The 30-day reply window expires on {{{reply-due}}}. Any response received within or after that window will be reproduced verbatim on this page.

   Notice ref [[Notice:{{{notice-ref}}}|{{{notice-ref}}}]]
   Sent {{{sent}}}
   Reply by {{{reply-due}}}
   Response awaiting
   Audit trail [[Notice:{{{notice-ref}}}|view notice and correspondence]]

Expression error: Unexpected < operator.

notice is still within its window — this is

the only route around that block, and use should be rare.

Parameters:

  • text — what is sub judice / why caution applies (required)
  • justification — mandatory editorial reasoning for publishing anyway